Pascal’s wager is a risk/benefit assessment to determine whether or not a person should believe in god it in no way aims to prove that god exists unlike descartes, who tries to prove god’s existence through the idea of god himself pascal does not think such a proof can succeed. Pascal does not think that the atheist or the believer would be convinced by his argument instead, he directs the wager to the curious and unconvinced i have a choice: either first i believe god exists or second i do not believe god exists. -what do you think of the argument in pascal's wager is it convincing should it prompt someone to believe in the existence of god-jl mackie presents a very powerful argument against the existence of the god of most monotheistic religions (one that is all-good and all-powerful. The three arguments of pascal's wager on the existence of god pages 7 words 2,130 view full essay more essays like this: not sure what i'd do without @kibin - alfredo alvarez, student @ miami university exactly what i needed - jenna kraig, student @ ucla wow most helpful essay resource ever. However, if one wagers for the existence of god, the consequence is far much better than wagering against the existence of god therefore, rationally, pascal suggests it is better if a person accepts that god exists rather than god does not exist.
20 arguments for god’s existence by dr peter kreeft filed under the existence of god 316 comments 1 the argument from change 2 the argument from efficient causality the common consent argument 20 pascal's wager in this section you will find arguments of many different kinds for the existence of god. If all the gods that are in existence could be factored as per wagers arguments, the probability of people ending up in worshipping the wrong gods will be very high which therefore puts into doubt the authenticity of the mathematical advantage that pascal claims in his wager ( pascal 32. Pascal's wager is an argument in philosophy presented by the seventeenth-century french philosopher, mathematician and physicist blaise pascal (1623–62) it posits that humans bet with their lives that god either exists or does not.
Pascal's wager was a revolutionary apologetic device it is not an argument for the claim that god exists that sort of argument appeals to evidence, whether empirical or conceptual the wager is an argument that belief in god is pragmatically rational, that inculcating a belief in god is the action dictated by prudence to say that an action is pragmatically rational implies that it is in one. Neither rational argument nor evidence can prove the existence of god pascal claims that you must wager on the existence of god- make the bet that is in your best interest does pascal think we should believe that god exist true theoretical rationality. Pascal believes that we are forced to make a decision to either believe or not believe in god what does pascal think about people who accept the wager but can't bring himself to believe it pascal thinks that if someone accepts the wager but can't bring themself to beleive it that the issue lies with the person's passion.
Among the many arguments for the existence of god, perhaps the most irksome for many atheists, other than the ontological argument, is pascal’s wager. Instead of a two-way wager between god’s existence and non-existence, perhaps we could have a four-way wager among monotheism, zoroastrianism, hinduism, and atheism using the principle of indifference, we should assign a subjective probability of 25% each (or lower if there are more possibilities. Pascal’s wager is an argument for the existence of god developed by 17th century mathematician and philosopher blaise pascal pascal’s wager is the most famous part of his collection of notes known as the pensées. Religious conversion, self-deception, and pascal’s wager for those who already have belief in the existence of god, arguments for his existence provide independent grounds for belief the believer need no longer proofs for the existence of god are not only useless, pascal suspects, they are.
Refutations of pascal’s wager and the ontological argument when debating a theist about the existence of god, there are two arguments that many of them tend to rely on as last ditch efforts. A similar thought to this has been used by michael martin as the basis for an atheistic version of pascal’s wager, a pragmatic argument for disbelief in god if any pragmatic argument of the form of pascal’s wager is sound, martin argues, then it is an argument for atheism, rather than for religious belief. Blaise pascal | the wager about god's existence (pensées) | philosophy core concepts a debate on the existence of god: the cosmological argument -- f c copleston vs bertrand russell. The argument from pascal’s wager–by peter kreeft most philosophers think pascal’s wager is the weakest of all arguments for believing in the existence of god.
The “which god” argument against pascal’s wager is therefore beside the point i think the evidence for the existence of god far outweighs the evidence against it and many others think the opposite in either case, pascal’s wager is useless is pascal's wager a good argument for believing in god not even close first,. Some who comment on pascal’s wager argue that there are several parts to the one wager argument while others think that there are multiple arguments within the few pages of the wager while still others argue for both views. In these arguments they claim to demonstrate that all human experience and action (even the condition of unbelief, itself) is a proof for the existence of god, because god's existence is the necessary condition of their intelligibility.
Pascal’s wager: logical consistency and usefulness as an argument for the existence of god robert peterson there are only four possibilities, four and only four. Blaise pascal’s infamous “wager” doesn’t get a lot of credit for being a rigorous philosophical argument for the existence of god, and with good reason it is not a rigorous philosophical argument for the existence of god nor is it meant to be. To understand pascal's wager you have to understand the background of the argument pascal lived in a time of great scepticism medieval philosophy was dead, and medieval theology was being ignored or sneered at by the new intellectuals of the scientific revolution of the seventeenth century.